How To Turbocharge Google Sniper by Terry Kyle (Part 1)

At the outset of this analysis of George Brown’s “Google Sniper” system, I want to clarify a few points.
Firstly, I don’t know George, have never met him or corresponded with him – though I will notify him of this post as a courtesy.
Having gone through the “Google Sniper” content, George strikes me as a guy in Internet Marketing for the long haul and he works pretty hard to deliver plenty of value for his buyers and monthly subscribers.
Late last year, while still fumbling around looking for a solid IM business model with consistent results, which I wasn’t getting at the time, I came across IPK (Info Product Killer) which uses many similar principles to “Google Sniper” (GS). There are obvious differences too, of course. IPK is geared towards Amazon, GS is generally targeting ClickBank, though both systems could be directed at any product.
Without giving away George’s approach (it’s the details that matter anyway), both his system and IPK focus on a single, low-competition keyword with a minisite; WordPress in the case of GS.
The reason that I keep discussing these two systems together is because they both share a fundamental approach and in both cases, I view that common principle as a limitation without which both would work much better. That commonality is an over-reliance on On-Page SEO (OPSEO as Craig from IPK called it).
Now in offering these thoughts, I am not ‘sniping’ (get it?) at George’s success, far from it. In fact, nothing would please me more than to see it working even more powerfully than it seems to be now.
In the case of IPK and GS, both creators are generally of the view that the On Page SEO is all you need to worry about and that will be enough to deliver high rankings. In my experience with IPK, that was very hit-and-miss. Stupidly, in November 2008, I didn’t yet understand the power of good backlinking campaigns and just went on building site after site after site. I made some money with some sites but overall my success was relatively disappointing. And, with some decent backlinking, those sites could have made me a small fortune. To be fair, George does detail some backlinking in his training videos but it’s fairly basic and is presented as a less desirable ‘Plan B’.
With my other IM models, I love to join together ‘bits’ or chunks of different systems and add them together to create ugly ‘Frankenstein’ models that work really well.
Here, I feel that this is what GS is crying out for – more ‘bits’ from other systems to ramp up its power.
Let me explain what I mean.
George has certain numbers that he recommends in terms of competition levels for a successful GS site. I’m not going to reveal those here. The problem here – and this has come up on George’s webinars in his monthly support program – is that it can be pretty hard to:
[a] find any keywords with competition that low and with enough monthly searches to make it worthwhile; and,
[b] think of actual keywords that haven’t been saturated yet.
Here’s my solution to both of those problems. If you have a backlink routine set up with outsourcers – I use 5 at the moment – it’s nothing to add another URL and keyword into that cycle and be building hundreds, possibly thousands of backlinks to your new GS site in the normal business of monthly backlinking.
For example, from 3-4 months of solid backlinking, my site at backlinksblackbelt.com is between #9 on Page 1 and #11 on Page 2 for the term ‘backlinks’ and – using George’s ‘sniff test’ measure of “in quotes” competition as an initial starting point – my competitors are around 2.7 million.
And that’s up against plenty of backlinking gurus? It will be much easier in other niches!
If Google Snipers embraced serious backlinking, they could massively raise the number of terms they could go after and open up hundreds of thousands of new niche keyword possibilities. Trying to look for those with the low competition numbers that George suggests is pretty frustrating – trust me, I’ve tried. Especially for anything resembling a buying keyword with some traffic that justifies building a site.
The second big problem is thinking up actual words to try in the heavily saturated niches that George talks about. The single best tool to use here is Google’s own Wonder Wheel which suggests related groups of words where new possibilities are continually opened up with. For example, if you use the free Wonder Wheel (video below) on the Search term, “approaching women” it suggests many other great possibilities like “fear of rejection” (which you can click on and get related phrases from) which then leads to a bunch of other terms like “overcoming shyness” e.g.
Google Wonder Wheel Video
In my view, the Google Wonder Wheel is almost the best ever IM tool invented – and it’s perfect for frustrated Google Snipers! Type in “weight loss”, and go down through a few spokes of the wheel and you’ll have keywords galore to then check with Keyword Elite.
So let’s assume that you’re a Google Sniper and you’ve embraced backlinking to go after much bigger fish, competition-wise and you’re using the Google Wonder Wheel to get loads of ideas.
But what about speeding up the Site Creation?
What I would do is use some additional WordPress plugins like WPUnique (or Content Blender), WP Sticky (modified to make one post stay on the front page permanently) and Analyticator.
WP Unique does some weird coding stuff that overcomes duplicate content issues. Therefore, every single post on your WP blog can be PLR on that issue EXCEPT your sales letter story/review which should be taken almost word for word from one of your other successful Google Sniper sites with slight alterations to suit the new product. WP Unique means there will be no duplicate content penalty.
If you have a proven sales letter, the Google Wonder Wheel will show you dozens/hundreds of other places to create GS sites for those terms – and with WP Unique, you can use the same sales letter and PLR! Send me 25% of all the money you make from this approach.
Can you imagine how much faster it would be to create a GS site this way. You could even put all the PLR articles in at once but set their publication on a staggered pattern over the coming month. Once a blog is noticed by Google publishing daily, I find the bots pick up a new post in under 30 minutes.
The solution to making the sales letter stick to the front page isn’t to make the sales letter a Page instead of a Post. In my experience, Google likes Posts more than Pages and I would ONLY backlink the inner post page with the sales letter – nothing else. Incidentally, the backlinks blog where you are probably reading this had only 1 post, no contact details, no Privacy policy, no LSI optimisation. Nada. Just a ton of backlinks coming into that original post.
One other caveat is to be wary of registering trademarked names in domains – that could be trouble later with a C & D letter, or worse.
So, if anyone thinks I’ve been unfair or mean to George in the above critique, let me say this.
GS is excellent in forcing marketers to embrace WordPress and it is about as simple a system as you will find for newbies – even with the add-ons recommended here: PLR, WP Unique, WP Sticky, loads of Backlinking and – if it were me – other backlinked Web 2.0 sites such as Articlesbase, Metacafe video and Squidoo (the slap is over apparently) etc to lock up more of the Page 1 real estate on a term that your GS site is bringing in money on.
GS is also pretty good on learning the art of preselling.
There’s more I could talk about but that’s enough in one meal. If you found this analysis useful let me know in the comments box below or by emailing (and don’t forget my 25% cut!).
Oh and great work George – I really was trying to help!
Best regards
Terry Kyle
The Backlinks Black Belt Report

Great insights, Terry. I’m a GS owner and have come to the same conclusions on backlinking. Thanks for offering up some ideas on top of that!
Kelly
Excellent post Terry! I am along the same lines of thinking you are in regards to expanding on the GS system.
I am using WP unique for all my GS sites and feel it’s working out great. I’ll definitely look into the other plugins you suggested.
I also am creating several web 2.0 platforms as primary feeders to both rank on page 1 and funnel link juice and traffic to my main site.
As for back linking, I use a diversified linking strategy, although I have been able to lower the degree of the linking campaigns with the GS system which is nice as it saves time and effort compared to bigger projects.
One thing I would appreciate you expanding upon for me so I understand it correctly… “Google likes Posts more than Pages and I would ONLY backlink the inner post page with the sales letter – nothing else.”
The inner post page, you are referring to the very first post of your site? You wouldn’t put any effort into back links for any of the other posts or pages following the original post?
Another thing I’d love your opinion on and have not yet tested myself but plan to, is adding a youtube video and outbound link to a site like wikipedia. I know this goes down the road of getting away from the original steps of the system, but do you see any cons to doing so.
I would make the ending of the youtube video extend for about 5 mins longer so the visitor isn’t encourage to click off to youtube and only include one outbound link to something like wikipedia. Basically do you think adding these elements would pull the visitor away from the adsense block?
Anyway, I’m rambling. Thanks for a great post and your time and attention to my comments.
Terry
Excellent analysis and thank you for this well researched information.
I am not familiar with “Analyticator”. What does it do?
On-page seo, as you mentioned, is really a minor factor compared to backlinks – I have also proven that fact with some very competitive keywords.
Cheers
leon
Hey Terry,
I just re-read your black belt report and found the answer to my question. Thanks again for all your contributions!
exellent points. I too found it a bit discouraging trying to find these impossible buying keywords that weren’t overly competitive.
Terry-you said “I would ONLY backlink the inner post page with the sales letter – nothing else.”
Can’t this get you in a bit of trouble though? If Google sees the linking pattern ONLY going to the index or “sticky” post wouldn’t they seee this an unnatural backlinking pattern and devalue your links?(since people in reality link to all sorts of inner pages as well)
Do you have a recommended resource to find good outsourcers to backlink? Or a specific outsourcing approach that works best?
Terry this is truly some great info!! when you talk about you only backlink your inner pages will that in turn help the top level url? BTW i think your war room thread is the best IM infotmation i have ever come across.
Hey Terry,
Great post mate,
I have been through Google Sniper and built half a dozen sites, relatively fast too, and one in particular took me 1 day to build and with in 3 weeks was making $150 a week…BUT you are dead right, I went after higher competition and blitzed that baby with back links.
Finding those low competition keywords with the right search volume is horribly painful in my opinion, especially when some consistent back linking can snatch you are nice volume keyword.
The problem I am finding with Sniper sites, that you touched on above is that all my links are pointing to the root domain, and not the posts, and although its ok now, I wonder if Google will slap me for that…mmm…lets hope not.
Thanks for all your great insight Terry
Cheers
Matt
I learn so much from you. Trying to digest it all and use what I’m learned and am learning in a new site I am going to build. My main site is my joy and I do want to make money form but I see that I can make money quicker with single products and single focused pages, blogs then full blows sites.
I’m also trying to get the idea of ‘backlinking the inner post page with the sales letter-nothing else.’ I have the same question Dan does.
I don’t use GS but I use a similar approach to building minisites. I have found that building backlinks is a necessity to keep my sites ranking well.
very good tips and good to hear that backlinks will continue to dominate a page or posts’ true value.
Agreed it’s going to take a bit more than a few posts and backlinks to crack most decent markets. You might get lucky otherwise but that would be the exception not the rule.
If I saw a site ranking well using the more simplistic approach it could easily be beat with putting in a bit more work in.
Hey Terry,
Great information as usual!
I am just wondering, if you allocate a single post to the front page, will the home page still show as http://www.domain.com OR http://www.domain.com/post_name
Also, will the post be clickable as it is usually, so it will then be taken to http://www.domain.com/post_name
Finally, do you then create a new page for the other posts? If so, how do you go about that?
Thanks for all your great stuff!
You Rock!
Dennis
Hey Terry!
This is a totally awesome analysis. I have both products and decided that IPK was a little easier for me. I was also struggling trying to find these elusive keywords.
Your analysis has gotten me back on track and will save me hundreds of hours of wasted time in the future which, of course, will now translate to more revenue.
Thanks for sharing this great info.
R
With all the modifications needed to make George’s system work, I am puzzled as to why you think it is a good system worth $77. There is nothing ground breaking about keyword rich domains, page titles and meta descriptions.
Almost everybody agrees that backlinking is the key to ranking the “Sniper sites”. Therefor his system as a stand alone system is almost worthless. Yet the kid absolutely cleaned up selling that POS and everyone wants to rave about how good the system was. I don’t get it.
Terry, re this comment: “The solution to making the sales letter stick to the front page isn’t to make the sales letter a Page instead of a Post. In my experience, Google likes Posts more than Pages…”
I don’t get it, don’t you contradict yourself here?
Anthony